|
cardan by
| | Now |
cardan by
Cubics can be hard.
Consult a really good maths textbook. |
| June 30, 2009 | 8:53 pm | Report abuse | Reply |
cardan by
The derivation is long and messy. (You don't simply complete the cube.)
If you start with x^3+bx^2+cx+d=0, you first make the substitution
x = y -b/3. The result is a "reduced cubic equation" which has the form:
y^3+ py + q = 0. You then can find the roots of this by making another substitution y =z - p/(3z) which yields a 6 th degree equation in z:
z^6 +qz^3 -p^3/27 = 0. You solve this for z^3 by the quadratic equation ( since z^6 = (z^3)^2 ). The argument then gets more complicated and involves knowing about the imaginary cube roots of unity, etc., etc..
As I said, long and messy..
You can find it worked out in older math books on the theory of equations. I'm sure you can google it and find a Web site that has it worked out as well. |
| June 30, 2009 | 3:05 pm | Report abuse | Reply |
|
|
don't know them. maybe you could take a look on this website: www.slogbox.com
recommend
|
 |
Ver resultados en otros idiomas |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Wait
Add your comment
Thank you for helping us improve the quality of this site.
|